Readers Write (2/10/05)
                                                                                                                                                            Home


 On Tuesday I asked whether fare increases at both GO Transit and the TTC would set back efforts to improve Toronto’s air quality.  Brandon Donnelly of Toronto writes, “What annoys me most about the fare hike is not so much the fact that I will be paying more, but that I will be paying more for a system that... is inadequate. I believe that living in a city should mean a car is completely optional. I do not own a car, and I have no intention to buy one in the near future. I do however feel that my mobility should not be compromised. Unfortunately I spend every morning squished on a King streetcar in a slow and lengthy battle through morning traffic.

 “We are not moving towards cleaner air quickly enough -- absolutely not. This city lacks proper alternatives to the automobile; our transit is inadequate and our streets lack bike lanes. Although I am not alone in my kvetching, the problem cannot be easily solved. It requires drastic measures, measures that require funding, tenacity and drive.”

 Darren Ruddock of Whitby writes, “I too noticed that in Friday’s Metro there were announcements about transit cost increases and an article on winter smog. This is a real shame -- but it is painfully obvious that in spite of the societal, economical and environmental benefits of affordable and accessible public transportation, this is not a high priority for our elected representatives. Next election I'm hoping that David Suzuki runs for office because the alternates stink like the GTA air.”

 Regular reader Erik Nippak of Toronto writes, “Much of the mess of the TTC is of its own making, because of its inability to automate (fare collection), as well as decisions to purchase buses and other equipment that is politically driven, not based on the needs of 99% of the users. Two major things have to happen to turn things around -- the TTC has to find efficiencies with automation, make better spending decisions and reduce the wage bill, while the province has to stabilize funding. Every year there are the same predictable arguments -- the city wants the TTC to squeeze more out of what it has, and the TTC presents a huge bill to keep the status quo. It's a game that has to end if Toronto wants to be considered a world class city. The folks that run the TTC, plus the politicians that decide on funding, should get out more to other cities (Hong Kong and Singapore are good examples) and see how a first class system is run.”

 Tyler Wade of North Toronto writes, “I have been riding the TTC for five years now. The only improvements I've seen is the rate in which the TTC is declining. The TTC has griped for years now about more funding. Here's what I want... I want the TTC to open their books to the public for a little inquiry. I want to evaluate salaries. I want to see where the money is going. Essentially, I don't want this hot air anymore. I want real proof that the TTC needs money and I want assurance that they're spending it where it's needed. We have one of the highest commuter populations, what else do you need?”

 I often hear from readers who question the way the TTC directs its scant funds. It’s quite true that politicized decisions and other inefficiencies can and do lead to wasted dollars, yet TTC finances are some of the most scrutinized of any transit agency I know. We’ll examine some of those expenditures in the future.

 Send e-mail to transit@eddrass.com. Include address and phone number.

© Ed Drass 2008