Readers Light Up (1/14/05)
                                                                                                                                                            Home

 

In case you missed it, over the last few weeks I’ve been going on about headlamps -- and now it’s time to sit back and let some readers weigh in. Lorimer Rutty of Burlington writes, “There are thousands of vehicles on Ontario roads running both headlights and upgraded 'fog' lights. This amounts to four headlights. It's not much of a stretch to assume that we do not have an provincial government interested in administering its own laws regarding the number and power of headlight lamps. The penalty for such negligence should be that bureaucrats must drive on two-lane highways from 7 p.m. until midnight for seven consecutive nights. After they visit their respective eye doctors, they might think about enforcing the law.”

Allan Rostic of Niagara Falls believes “headlights, especially on new cars, are becoming very much brighter. So much so, that I find myself always wearing a hat at night so I can use the brim to shield my eyes from the brightness. Sometimes it is very difficult to judge whether the other guy has his high beams on or not. You drive along a lone stretch of highway, and ... flash your high beams at a considerable distance, since you know that as he approaches the lights will only get brighter. Then he flashes his brights and you are almost blinded. Some low beams!”

Don Janzen of Ruthven, Ontario takes up the case: “Are my eyes getting more sensitive in my old age or are headlights getting brighter? As if this weren't enough, what's with the morons who insist on having their fog lights on all the time? Don’t they care how dangerous this is? SUVs are the worst -- brighter headlights mounted at eye level plus totally unnecessary fog lights. An acquaintance that drives a tricked-out Ford Explorer said that paying $50,000 for a vehicle gave him the right to use all the lights he had, even if it blinded oncoming traffic. Nice, eh?”

Mike McNeil is also peeved by the improper use of fog lamps. “Many times I’ve flashed my high beams at oncoming drivers -- thinking that they have their high beams on -- only to be responded to by a higher intensity flash. Why do people have to drive around with their accessory lights on? I don’t think they forgot to turn them off -- I mean, how often do we need to use fogs in our climate? Obviously the driver thinks his car looks ‘cool’ with them. Throw in the added height of SUVs and trucks and you have a dangerous situation. This situation is truly aggravating when these vehicles are traveling behind.”

Let’s hand the baton to Erik Nippak of Toronto: “I do have a beef about the SUVs that have higher mounted headlights that will shine into regular cars. I think it's time to readdress this by forcing SUVs to conform more to car requirements  -- such as bumper heights and headlight placement.”

As for me, I wonder how we will manage these two opposing forces, namely our collectively aging eyeballs and the steady escalation of vehicle lighting. A large number of concerned drivers might convince governments to act, from streamlining new car requirements to properly enforcing after-market add-ons. I hear Transport Canada is working with the U.S. government and the United Nations to harmonize the height of headlamps on cars and SUVs, but progress is apparently slow. And what about the combined use of fog and regular headlamps -- can we realistically require that only one set be illuminated at a time? Perhaps we need a worldwide automotive summit, bringing together vehicle and part manufacturers, scientists, engineers and public officials. Should go smoothly, don’t you think?

 Ed Drass

Email the Traffic Guru at edrass@nationalpost.com

© Ed Drass 2008