Leaside Redway (3/19/04)
                                                                                                                                                            Home

 

Not since two-block-long Fort York Boulevard was threaded under the Gardiner from the Lake Shore to Bathurst has the city of Toronto built any new road links. I may have sniffed out some more asphalt, thanks to a query from Leaside’s Erik Nippak, who laments the lack of progress on the Redway Road connection between Millwood Road and the Bayview extension. It turns out this relatively minor, and controversial, road is part of a much larger scheme, one that takes in the entire Don River valley from Steeles to Lake Ontario.

But first, let’s catch up on the local traffic woes that fuel the debate about Redway. Motorists who drive down Leslie Avenue find that it stops dead at Eglinton Avenue, and many cut through the maze-like suburb of Leaside toward the Bayview extension and then downtown. The inhabitants of this vehicular briar patch  -- most of whom are drivers themselves -- are tired of being a high-traffic conduit.

Since Leslie is never to be extended, the Leasiders want a smaller southern bypass to unclog their streets. Redway Road, originally proposed as a four lane link, ran into thorny political opposition -- let’s just call it Rosedale. Those tony denizens have repeatedly said no way to Redway, seeing it as a congestion funnel, aimed right at them. There are those who slag Torontonians as auto-haters, but it is often car-rich neighbourhoods that fight traffic the hardest -- and they often win.

In 2004, the Redway redux has the road slimmed to two lanes, but it is a mere 600-meter smidge compared to the much larger rethink now encompassing the Don River Valley. A few years ago, Toronto city council shot down a proposal to widen and charge tolls on the overloaded Don Valley Parkway. In doing so, the councillors ordered up a master plan of this heavily used transportation corridor - taking in all roads, rails and highways between Vic Park and Bayview.

Everyone took aim at the DVP upgrade plan -- some attacked the proposal to toll the extra lanes, and even pro-road engineers rolled their eyes at the exorbitant cost of building into the valley. Still, some illuminating number-crunching has followed, resulting an an unexpected revolution in transport planning. When geography and money are tight, the focus turns to moving as many people as possible, not vehicles. When GO transit announced that creative scheduling would allow an extra rush hour train on the line that traverses the valley, it was revealed that a single train can carry as many people as an entire DVP lane over one hour.

The city, the TTC and GO are now looking at how transit can beef up in the corridor, including adding “queue jump” lanes to the DVP. This low-tech trick allows buses to use existing shoulders to bypass traffic whenever the roadway dons its alternate identity; the Parking Lot. The Ministry of Transportation (MTO) is involved as well, because it owns ten-lane Highway 404 north of the 401. MTO is busy building a new High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane southbound on the 404, which will eventually hook up with the westbound 401. City and provincial engineers are also scrutinizing the top of the DVP to see if those crazy lanes can be made more rational.

The future benefits to Parkway drivers may appear slim, since transit is seen as the mode that can deliver real commuter volumes to the corridor. But that brings us back to Redway. Because this connector could potentially be used by buses to link downtown to the highrise neighbourhoods of Thorncliffe and Flemingdon Park, the road might actually be built. And you can bet if it does, Leasiders will make damn sure cars can use it too.

Commuters and residents can pick and choose among all the possibilities when the Don corridor study goes to public meetings in late April.

Ed Drass, National Post

Email the Traffic Guru at edrass@nationalpost.com or fax him at 416-322-7016

© Ed Drass 2008